Online News – New
from Environmental Finance Publications
Sign
up to receive this weekly news service
direct to your inbox
|
UK to set standard on voluntary carbon
offsets

London, 18 January: The UK government is to develop
a standard for voluntary carbon offsetting, which will be
based on credits from markets created by the Kyoto Protocol.
But some offset providers are incensed that the government
has ignored verified emission reductions (VERs) generated
by non-Kyoto projects and have criticised the inclusion of
allowances (EUAs) from the EU Emissions Trading Scheme (ETS)
in the plans.
The government launched a consultation today on the standard
and an associated code of practice, proposing that offset
providers supply consumers with clear information and transparent
prices.
Environment secretary David Miliband said: "People need
to be sure that the way they offset is actually making a difference.
The government's standard and code of practice, with a quality
mark so people can check easily before they choose an offsetting
product, will help to provide that certainty."
The government's standard would be based on credits from
sources regulated by Kyoto bodies, such as Certified Emission
Reductions (CERs) generated by Clean Development Mechanism
(CDM) projects, and Emission Reduction Units from Joint Implementation
(JI) projects, as well as EUAs.
Jonathan Shopley, chief executive of the CarbonNeutral Company,
a UK-based offset provider, welcomed government support for
voluntary standards, but said it was "missing a trick"
by excluding verified emission reductions (VERs) that are
not governed by the Kyoto mechanisms.
"CERs are often focused on large industrial-scale emission
reduction projects
Voluntary schemes [generating VERs]
which are more local- and community-based often have more
relevance and consumers can more easily see the benefits,"
he said.
Mark Kenber, policy director at NGO The Climate Group, said
the proposal "does provide some guarantee of quality,
but only by artificially restricting the market. It doesn't
seem to make an awful lot of sense there are lot of good
[carbon abatement] projects that don't want to go through
CDM accreditation".
Both were surprised that EUAs were included in the government
plans as a possible source of carbon offsets. The vast majority
of allowances are given away free to companies in the EU ETS
and are essentially a permission to pollute, not an emission
reduction.
"This is an attempt by the government to tighten up
the very lax markets in the EU ETS," said Shopley, referring
to the oversupply of allowances in the first phase of the
EU scheme.
Other standards for offsets have already been launched in
the market, such as the Gold Standard and the Voluntary Carbon
Standard, the latter being developed by The Climate Group
and the International Emissions Trading Association.
A recent report
by the Carbon Trust, an independent company funded by the
UK government, noted five standards that met its minimum level
of quality. These included CDM/JI, the Gold Standard and the
Voluntary Carbon Standard.
Details of the consultation are posted on the Defra website.
The closing date for responses is 13 April 2007.
|