Online News – New
from Environmental Finance Publications
Sign
up to receive this weekly news service
direct to your inbox
|
Voluntary programmes 'weak, but prepare
market' RFF

New York, 8 February: Voluntary environmental programmes
have limited impact, but can help participants and regulators
prepare for mandatory schemes, concludes a new book from US
think-tank Resources for the Future (RFF).
Reality
Check: Voluntary Environmental Programs was written
by various authors and edited by RFF senior fellows Richard
Morgenstern and William Pizer. It examines seven efforts in
the US, Europe and Japan, including the US Environmental Protection
Agency's Climate Wise programme and the UK's 2001 Climate
Change Agreements.
The editors see "explosive growth" in voluntary
programmes since the early 1990s, counting 87 at the EPA,
dozens at the US Department of Energy, 300 in Europe and 30,000
in Japan (though this includes single firms working with local
agencies). They attribute the surge to "growing optimism"
about cooperation between government and business, but also
to "widespread frustration with the long and expensive
battles often associated with new environmental regulations".
During a 7 February conference call, Pizer said the programmes
produced reductions in environmental impacts in the 0-10%
range, averaging 5%, with the UK programme reaping 9% because
it offered tax benefits. "That's not a huge effect,"
he said. "If you want major changes in behaviour, you
need more than voluntary programmes."
Some environmental groups dislike voluntary efforts, Morgenstern
notes, fearing they "shift the focus from the worst polluters
to the more progressive ones that tend to participate in these
programmes".
But he sees benefits, since such programmes give companies
"hands-on" experience, provide them with technical
assistance from governments, enhance their reputations, and
allow them to influence future regulation. Governments can
also build support for future mandates, Morgenstern added.
Working in voluntary programmes also forces firms to track
their emissions and examine their operations, Pizer said.
"People get used to what a regulatory approach is likely
to require and are less frightened," he commented.
|