Online News – New
from Environmental Finance Publications
Sign
up to receive this weekly news service
direct to your inbox
|
Sarasin warns investors on biofuels

London, 27 July: Biofuel production has a substantial
environmental impact that will limit growth in the sector,
according to a recent bank report.
The current methods of producing bioethanol and biodiesel
are not as environmentally friendly and socially compatible
as their "bio" label suggests, says the report*
from Basel-based Bank Sarasin.
"The sharp rises in the share price of companies in
the biofuels business clearly reflect investors' high expectations.
We are less excited about the future of this industry, because
its expansion will quickly come up against certain natural
constraints," says Matthias Fawer-Wasser, the bank's
sustainability analyst.
Large-scale biofuel production could require vast tracts
of monoculture plantations that reduce biodiversity and take
up agricultural land that could be used for food or animal
feed crops, the bank argues. There are also negative implications
for agricultural workers in terms of exposure to agrochemicals.
The bank gives bioethanol a better sustainability rating
than biodiesel, as there are more raw materials to source
it from, a higher yield per hectare and superior performance
in terms of reducing carbon dioxide emissions.
But unless there are technological advances in turning plant
material into transport fuel so that not just the edible
parts of plants are used Fawer-Wasser estimates the limit
for socially-responsible use of biofuels at 5% of current
petrol and diesel consumption in the EU and US. This is less
than the EU's target of 5.75% by 2010.
However, of the 16 companies analysed in the report, 10 qualify
for inclusion in Sarasin's sustainable investment universe,
although for some of them biofuels are a small part of their
business.
The 10 qualifying companies are: Abengoa, Biofuels Corp,
D1 Oils, EOP Biodiesel, Pacific Ethanol, Renova Energy, Xethanol,
Neste Oil, Novozymes, and Sunopta. The six rated as ineligible
for inclusion are: Biopetrol Industries, Cosan, Archer Daniels
Midland, Agrana, Bunge, and Südzucker.
* Biofuels transporting us to a fossil-free future?
Bank Sarasin, July 2006.
|