Online News – New
from Environmental Finance Publications
Sign
up to receive this weekly news service
direct to your inbox
|
Emerging markets lag on sustainability
EIRIS

London, 28 September: Companies in emerging markets
trail their developed world peers on sustainability, but some
do present opportunities for responsible investment, according
to a report by Ethical Investment Research Services (EIRIS).
Broadening
the horizons for responsible investment surveyed the
public disclosures of 50 major emerging market companies,
and found that most are making some efforts to address environmental,
social and governance issues.
But, while the report finds that possibilities exist for
"diversification and risk management for investors as
well as wider potential gains for sustainability", it
also shows that emerging markets are yet to fully embrace
corporate social responsibility (CSR).
Only 15 of the 50 companies included in the report achieved
a rating of more than five out of 10 on environmental issues.
And the average score for a chemicals company in emerging
markets is 1.6 out of 10, compared with 7.7 in developed markets.
But in other sectors the difference is less pronounced. Emerging
markets banks scored an average of 5.2, while banks in developed
markets scored 6.5.
Some high impact industries, such as metals, oil and gas
producers and mining, scored surprisingly well in the study.
Companies making serious efforts to address CSR issues include
South African chemicals firm Sasol, Korean steel giant POSCO
and China Steel. "Others are perhaps either complacent
or have not faced sufficient social pressures to address their
environmental impacts," the report says.
EIRIS also found wide-ranging differences between countries.
"Whilst South Africa appears notably ahead of other emerging
markets, some countries have yet to produce evidence of companies
embracing CSR and addressing sustainability issues in a substantial
way e.g. China, although commentators expect this to change,"
the report says.
"Other countries may show positive signs in some spheres
but lag behind in others. For instance, Taiwanese companies
received poor governance scores, yet a number of them showed
evidence of 'good' environmental practices."
In addition, EIRIS scored companies on their corporate governance
performance, including adherence to core governance principles,
the number of women on their boards and the quality of their
social, environmental and ethical risk management.
|