Online News – New
from Environmental Finance Publications
Sign
up to receive this weekly news service
direct to your inbox
|
Boreal forests 'worth $250 billion a
year'

London, 28 September: Boreal forests are worth around
$250 billion a year in 'ecosystem services', according to
a report by a Canadian economist.
These coniferous forests, located in the sub-Arctic regions
of the northern hemisphere, have value in trapping carbon
dioxide and filtering water, said Mark Anielski. He presented
his research to the 10th National Forest Congress in Canada
this week, calling for governments to develop an accounting
system that would highlight the economic benefits of protecting
the environment.
Logging, oil and gas extraction and hydroelectric generation
contributed $48.9 billion to Canada's economy in 2002, the
report finds. However, Anielski estimates that the environmental
costs of these activities remove $11.1 billion from this value.
In contrast, Anielski says that Canada's boreal ecosystem
services such as carbon sequestration, biodiversity, water
supply regulation and pest control were worth $93.2 billion
in 2002, or 2.5 times as much as resource extraction.
For example, Canada's forests absorb an estimated $1.8 billion
worth of carbon dioxide a year, while flood control and water
filtration from wetlands and peat lands contribute $80.4 billion
a year.
These figures were calculated from an estimate of how much
it would cost to replicate these effects if the forests and
wetlands disappear.
Extrapolated to take account of the 10 million square kilometres
of boreal forest in Canada, Russia, Sweden, Finland, Norway
and Alaska, the total global value of these ecosystem services
reaches $250 billion a year.
"If these ecosystem services were counted in Canada,
they would amount to roughly 9% of GDP. Ignoring these values
would be like leaving out the combined annual contribution
to GDP made by Canada's health and social services sector
and half of the public sector," Anielski said.
But he added: "It's only valuable in economic terms
when it's gone or it's scarce."
As well as informing government decision making, and providing
a basis for companies to value their efforts to preserve the
environment, the data could be used by reinsurance companies
to assess risk, he said.
|